Reckless Driving Reduced To Non-Moving Violation

Reckless Driving Reduced To Non-Moving Violation

One of the skilled traffic lawyers from The Weiland Firm, PLC recently represented a driver charged with reckless driving in a Virginia traffic court.

The driver was cited for exceeding the posted speed limit by enough of a margin to be charged with reckless driving rather than speeding by the law enforcement officer. Our attorney counseled the driver to complete specific steps prior to their court date.

The driver did so and had the charge reduced to a non-moving violation with The Weiland Firm’s attorney standing in for them so they did not have to attend the Virginia traffic court appearance.

If you or anyone you know has received a traffic violation or been charged with a traffic-related crime in Virginia contact The Weiland Firm, PLC at (804) 355-8037 for a free consultation.

The Weiland Firm, PLC is a leading Virginia Traffic Law Firm
Call (804) 355-8037 for a free consultation

Related Information:

  • Another Successful Case for The Weiland Firm, PLC The Weiland Firm, PLC received a fantastic result this week for a client charged with selling alcohol to a minor. As a result of our efforts on behalf of our client, the charge was dismissed. The client will maintain a clean criminal record, will be able to continue to work for a business that sells alcohol and completely avoided…

  • Hanover Va Successful Reckless Driving Case The Weiland Firm, PLC successfully defended a Hanover Reckless Driving by speed ticket. Our client received a ticket for traveling 87 MPH in a 70 MPH zone. Because the client followed the advice of our attorneys and provided us with the mitigation we needed to best defend the case, we were able to get the charge dismissed upon the…

  • Successful Defense Against Aggravated DUI – Case Dismissed An attorney for The Weiland Firm, PLC successfully defended a DUI case in a local court this week. The client was charged with an aggravated DUI because his blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was a .16. As a result, had the client been convicted, he would have received a significant fine, a mandatory active jail sentence, a twelve month license suspension, and a requirement…